You are using an outdated browser. There may be optical and technical problems.
OK, CLOSE
Being the decision-maker for a company's employees is a big responsibility, not least when it comes to occupational benefits. Regardless of whether a company is being set up or is in the midst of changing the pension fund, the choice of OPA solution greatly affects employees' retirement savings. As the conversion rate also determines the level of employees' pensions in the future, those in charge should look at the conversion rate of the available pension funds.
The conversion rate is a fixed percentage used to calculate the level of annual pension based on the amount of retirement assets saved.
The simple formula is retirement assets x conversion rate = annual pension
But the conversion rate is not just a conversion rate. Depending on the circumstances, it varies based on whether the retirement assets are credited to the mandatory or voluntary portion.
The conversion rate for the mandatory portion, notably pension fund contributions on an annual salary of up to CHF 84,600, is determined by the federal government. It is defined in the Occupational Benefits Insurance Act (OPA) and currently stands at 6.8 percent (2022). As it is not legally permissible to apply a lower conversion rate, this is also referred to as the minimum conversion rate. Using the current minimum conversion rate, retirement savings of CHF 10,000 would therefore generate a pension of CHF 6,800 p.a.
Pension institutions are not bound by a specific conversion rate for the voluntary portion of retirement assets (i.e. specifically the portion of pension fund contributions on the part of your salary that exceeds CHF 84,600). This means that the board of trustees is free to set that rate itself. Let's take a look at an example with Alexandre for a fictitious pension fund solution:
However, it's not always that simple, as there are also other options on the market.
Many pension funds only recognize one conversion rate and apply this to the entire retirement assets. This is known as a comprehensive conversion rate. However, if a different conversion rate is applied to the mandatory and voluntary portions of retirement assets, this is known as a split conversion rate.
If a split conversion rate is applied, the mandatory and voluntary portions are regarded separately and converted at the intended conversion rate .
With a comprehensive conversion rate, a single conversion rate is applied both to mandatory and voluntary benefits.
A comprehensive conversion rate below the minimum conversion rate (6.8 percent) is only possible if the statutory minimum pension is always maintained for every insured. This is based on the mandatory portion to which the minimum conversion rate is applied. In Sabine's case, this means: 6.8 percent of 300,000 = CHF 20,400. As her retirement pension amounts to CHF 34,800 in total when the comprehensive conversion rate is applied, this statutory requirement is met and the pension fund may pay the retirement pension calculated with the comprehensive conversion rate. Should the comprehensively calculated retirement pension be lower than CHF 20,400, the pension fund would have to increase the retirement pension to this amount. A pension fund also has to carry out the same control calculation (shadow accounting) if it applies a split conversion rate, but a conversion rate below the minimum conversion rate is used in the mandatory portion.
As already mentioned, the conversion rates are determined by the federal government (mandatory benefits) and the pension institutions (voluntary benefits). But of course, these figures are not simply plucked out of the the air. The following factors determine the level of conversion rates:
In the first instance, general life expectancy must be mentioned. This is self-evident because the older the retirees become, the longer they will draw their guaranteed retirement pension.
In 1948, the life expectancy of a 65-year old man was just 12 years, and that of a 65-year old woman a little more than 13 years. Today, the life expectancy is 22.7 years for women and 19.8 years for men. According to the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (in German), the life expectancy of 65-year old women will rise to almost 27 years by 2060 compared to 27 years for 65-year old men.
The technical interest rate is also a factor. This reflects what investment income can still be achieved on the insured's retirement assets during the pension period (i.e. on the portion of retirement assets that have not yet been paid out in the form of pensions). The technical interest rate is therefore influenced by the pension fund's expectations for long-term returns on low-risk investments.
When a retiree dies, benefits continue to be paid out under certain circumstances. For example, a surviving spouse or life partner may be entitled to a pension (e.g. 60 percent of the retirement pension). The conversion rate also has to factor in these benefits.
One of the greatest challenges for Swiss pension funds is how to set sustainably fundable conversion rates. Due to foreseeable demographic change (the baby boomer generation reaching pensionable age) and the growing number of retirements due to happen in the next few years, the shift from workers to retirees is also becoming an ever greater factor in occupational benefits due to the incorrectly set "shift from young to old" conversion rates. This must be offset, as this type of shift conflicts with the fully funded principle of occupational benefits which states that every generation is only paid as much in pensions as can be funded by the accumulated savings.
Yes. A high conversion rate does have a negative impact on the pensions of future pension recipients, i.e. today’s young people.
An excessively high conversion rate means that retirees won’t be able to rely on these pensions as their sole source of retirement funding. Money that would otherwise go to insureds who are still working today instead has to be used to fund current pensions. This means that these insureds will receive smaller pensions because they will have less saved in their occupational retirement account when they retire. In short, the pensions of future pension recipients will also be impacted.
What should company decision-makers consider when fulfilling their responsibility of finding the right OPA solution for their employees? The key to choosing a pension fund is to take full account of its long-term financial and structural performance and risk profile (e.g. through relevant figures) and at the same time also take a closer look at pension fund conversion rate models.
The following applies to the conversion rate in particular:
Vanessa Stöber is a Content Marketing Manager at AXA and researches interesting content for you on the subject of pensions.
We use cookies and analysis tools to improve your user experience, to personalize advertising by AXA and our advertising partner companies, and to provide social media functions. Unfortunately you cannot change your cookie settings via our Cookie Preference Center if you use Internet Explorer 11. If you would like to change your settings, please use an up-to-date browser. By using our website with this browser, you consent to the use of cookies.
